Concentration calculations
Alligation: mix two strengths and check the mass balance
Alligation is a convenient way to find the proportions of two preparations that produce an intermediate strength. Its shortcut is useful only when you can explain what the parts mean and verify the result.
Sources checked October 4, 2026. Independent educational content, not NABP exam questions or individual treatment advice.
Find the proportions before the quantities
For a fictional 7% w/w target from 20% and 2% w/w starting preparations, high-strength parts are 7 - 2 = 5. Low-strength parts are 20 - 7 = 13. The ratio is therefore 5 parts high-strength to 13 parts low-strength, not the other way around.
There are 18 total parts. To calculate a 360 g final mixture, each part represents 20 g. You need 100 g of the 20% preparation and 260 g of the 2% preparation. Most of the mixture uses the weaker preparation because 7% is much closer to 2% than to 20%.
Prove the shortcut with a mass balance
The strong preparation contributes 100 g × 0.20 = 20 g ingredient. The weak preparation contributes 260 g × 0.02 = 5.2 g. Together, 25.2 g ingredient in 360 g mixture is 7% w/w. That check catches a reversed ratio immediately.
You can solve the same problem without alligation. Let x be the grams of 20% preparation: 0.20x + 0.02(360 - x) = 0.07 × 360. Rearranging gives 0.18x = 18, so x = 100 g. Use the method you can set up reliably, not the one that looks shortest on paper.
Know when the method does not apply
A 25% target cannot be produced by mixing only 20% and 2% preparations of the same ingredient. Any weighted average must lie between the input strengths. A negative number of parts is not a practical solution; it tells you the target is outside the available range.
Alligation also assumes compatible concentration bases and a mixture model that conserves the ingredient. For w/w mixtures, use masses. For a volume-based question, use its stated volume assumptions. Do not mix a w/w percentage and a w/v percentage without the information required to reconcile them.
Separate an arithmetic model from a formulation
The example is an original calculation exercise, not an instruction to compound an actual medicine. Compatibility, homogeneous mixing, stability, ingredient identity and appropriate preparation procedures remain separate questions. The archived USP calculation proposal is linked for its mathematical explanation, not as a current standard of compounding practice.
For exam review, save the ratio, total parts and reverse check. If you keep reversing the preparations, compare the target with the low and high strengths before calculating. A target near the low strength should usually use more of the low-strength preparation. That qualitative check is fast and worth doing every time.
A worked example
Find masses of 20% and 2% w/w preparations for 360 g at 7% w/w.
- High parts = 7 - 2 = 5; low parts = 20 - 7 = 13
- 18 parts total; 360/18 = 20 g per part
- High = 100 g; low = 260 g; ingredient = 20 + 5.2 = 25.2 g
Answer: 100 g of 20% and 260 g of 2%
Try it before reading the answer
Write your setup, units and check first. These are original practice exercises, not recalled exam items.
1. Mix 10% and 2% w/w preparations to make 200 g at 6% w/w. Find the masses.
Equal parts: 6 - 2 = 4 and 10 - 6 = 4. Use 100 g of each. Ingredient totals 10 + 2 = 12 g; 12/200 = 6%.
2. Can 10% and 2% preparations produce 12% by mixing only those two?
No. 12% is above both input strengths.
3. Why should a 7% target use more 2% than 20% preparation?
The target lies closer to 2%. The mass balance requires only 5/18 of the mixture to be the 20% preparation.
Continue learning
Put the topic into a study planSources and scope
Source dates and limits matter. Follow the current official source for clinical or regulatory decisions. Mathematical examples do not establish a safe dose, suitable formulation or compounding procedure.